Anche Science chiede conto al Governo Italiano di come vengono dati i fondi per la ricerca

06 Mar 2011
Post2PDF Versione PDF

La ribellione a dei meccanismi non trasparenti di meritocrazia continua a montare e speriamo che chi ha promesso fondi dica finalmente una parola chiara. Oppure chi ha sostenuto di aver “reperito” 20 milioni di euro ci spieghi chi sono i donatori pubblici e chi i privati. Intanto la più prestigiosa rivista scientifica mondiale, Science, si deve occupare dell’Italia in modo di certo non lusinghiero.

Come più volte sostenuto dall’attuale Ministro dell’Università e Ricerca Gelmini, per tutti deve valere il principio della meritocrazia e torniamo qui a chiedere in che modo sia stata attuata tale valutazione meritocratica nel caso dei fondi promessi o attribuiti (ancora non si capisce) al programma geneticamente.

Italian Biotech Project Draws Fire From Researchers

di Laura Marghotti

An initiative launched by a nonprofit foundation in Italy that promotes innovation in agricultural genomics has recently sparked a storm of controversy among Italian and European biotechnologists. The scientists believe the foundation may be receiving significant funding from the Italian government without proper peer review of its proposed research.

During a conference in Rome in January, the Genetic Rights Foundation (FRG) presented a project called Geneticamente that would carry out several research projects over the next 4 years focusing on a technique called marker-assisted selection. MAS helps researchers select the best features of plants within the same species. FRG defines MAS as “a sustainable and environmentally friendly biotechnology offering the benefits of innovation without genetic contraindications of GMOs.”

The foundation’s president, philosopher Mario Capanna, told conferees that it aims to set up a leading research center in the agro-genomic sector that could become a point of reference for the rest of Europe and also spread its knowledge to North African countries. During the conference, Capanna said, “We have found resources to such an extent that we are now able to invest in this project €20 million from 2011 to 2015.”

The news rang alarm bells among researchers because it was not clear whether the government has already allocated the funding-which corresponds to one-fifth of the total budget for the Italian national research program for all disciplines-or whether the Geneticamente research project had undergone a peer-reviewed evaluation.

Last November, a number of public bodies, including the prime minister’s office and seven government ministries, signed an agreement to support the foundation without specifying the nature of that support. The prime minister’s office declined to provide ScienceInsider with any clarification about the potential allocation of the funding. FRG has already received €300,000 from the city of Rome and €500,000 from the Lazio region, which has also donated a historic castle in Ladispoli, a town near Rome, to house the research center with a free 20-year lease. Immunologist Fernando Aiuti, a councilor for the city of Rome, opposed the decision of the city to fund FRG on scientific grounds. He told ScienceInsider that the city’s funds were allocated without any prior peer-review evaluation of the project.

In January, the Association of Italian Biotechnologists (ANBI) wrote an open letter to the government expressing concern about how the project would be funded. The president of the European Federation of Biotechnology, Marc Van Montagu, followed suit last month with a letter asking the government to clarify whether the funding would be allocated. So far, neither body has received a reply. “We cannot be silent in front of an expected investment of €20 million that could be received by an NGO without any track record of scientific expertise in the scientific area of plant genetics and genomics,” says ANBI President Simone Maccaferri, “especially if this investment would be granted by public institutions without a proper scientific evaluation process”.

In a letter to ANBI, FRG said that it never claimed that it was already being funded by the government. “Capanna only meant to say that the cost of the entire project would be €20 million [and] that the foundation hopes to attract from public and private institutions in the near future,” an FRG spokesperson told ScienceInsider. Capanna has accused ANBI of spreading false information about the funding, adding that it is ready to take ANBI to court if the association refuses to apologize.

FRG Director Ivan Verga told ScienceInsider that so far the foundation has raised a total of €1.5 million from the city of Rome, the Lazio region, private investors, and its own resources. He says that they have also submitted proposals to both national and European funding bodies for another €2.5 million. However, Verga says he cannot reveal the names of those bodies for privacy reasons.

According to Verga, FRG now employs 11 researchers and has not yet set up a scientific advisory board, but it has appointed a scientific director. “A merely representative scientific board cannot exploit the synergies between the experience and skills of its members,” he says. “We intend to create several scientific committees whose members will also be actively involved in the process of addressing the future activities of the foundation.”

Comments:

Simone Maccaferri
There are a couple of details on this story that deserve to be mentioned.

Mario Capanna, President of FRG, is a philosopher. In the late 60s he was leader of the Student Movement and he has been elected in the Italian and European Parliament. In the past years he contributed to several anti-GMOs campaigns. He was used to exploit fake and scaring arguments like the strawberry-fish myth, and also to attack even personally all those scientists that tried to defend on scientific ground the transgenic approach to plant breeding. To give an example, the regarded oncologist Umberto Veronesi was named by him as “call girl”, or the genetist Roberto Defez as “carpet seller”.

Fabrizio Fabbri, Scientific Director of FRG, is the former Scientific Director of Greenpeace Italy. He also contributed to several anti-GMOs campaigns.

Ivan Verga, General Manager of FRG, has been Vice-president of the green movement Verdi Ambiente e Società (VAS). He also contributed to several anti-GMOs campaigns.

None of them has any (known) peer-reviewed publication in the field of biotechnology, MAS, genomics or GMOs.

Nevertheless, the statements of Ivan Verga reported in this article are self-explanatory on the FRG approach to scientific issues and quality control systems.

Moreover, GenEticaMente aims to promote a more “participatory” research in the field of green biotechnology. This sounds a bit ironic in the light of the lack of transparency, not only in the evaluation procedures employed by public institutions in granting their support to the project, but also in the names of the funding bodies that are intended to provide the missing 16 out of 20M€, needed to reach the budget claimed by Mario Capanna at the press conference.

The scientific community and the modern society feel the need for a more participative bio-based economy, but the FRG approach is not convincing, given both the ideological bias and the lack of qualified scientific skills.

Simone Maccaferri
President
ANBI - Association of the Italian Biotechnologists
Dipartimento di Biochimica “G. Moruzzi”
Bologna Italy

Useful links:

[1] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/
[2] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/03/italian-biotech-project-draws-fi.html
[3] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/03/italian-biotech-project-draws-fi.html#sci-comments
[4] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/03/us-bioethics-panel-to-review.html
[5] http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/03/two-week-spending-extension-aver.html
[6] http://www.biotecnologi.org

2 commenti al post: “Anche Science chiede conto al Governo Italiano di come vengono dati i fondi per la ricerca”

  1. franco nulliNo Gravatar scrive:

    Bello!
    Mi era sfuggito che il prof. Umberto Veronesi fosse (in italiano) una Puttana e che Roberto Defez di professione faccia il venditore di tappeti!
    Grazie al Presidente Maccaferri per le notizie di gossip che ci fornisce nel suo commento…

    Il buon vecchio Totò a questo punto direbbe ” ma mi faccia il piacere!”…
    Per me comunque il sig. Capanna rimane quello che ai tempi della mia università faceva un gran casino con i suoi compari e spesso mi precludeva il diritto allo studio con continue occupazioni delle facoltà. Sono arrivato a fare un esame su una panchina di Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, di fronte al Politecnico di Milano…
    Altro che Filosofo. Filone :-)

    Franco Nulli

  2. vu' cumpra'No Gravatar scrive:

    Caro Franco,
    capirai ora benissimo perchè io mi rivolga sempre con grande rispetto all’Onorevole di turno.
    Comunque la citazione completa era “venditore marocchino di tappeti”, perchè la vecchiaia porta anche al liberare quel po’ di malcelato razzismo.

Lascia un tuo commento

Per allegare una vostra immagine a fianco ai commenti registrarsi al sito Gravatar. Quando inserite la mail in fase di commento, bisogna usare la stessa mail che avete usato per registravi al Gravatar

Nella categoria: News, OGM & Mais, OGM & Ricerca

Le rubriche di Salmone

Luca Simonetti

Slow Food. Cattivo, sporco e sbagliato

Petrini aggiorna il suo manifesto, “Buono, pulito e giusto”. Qualche…